:: FSSH Rubrikgen 2.0 ::
Pengenalan



xxx

PENGENALAN

Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan (FSSK), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia mengiktiraf kepentingan peranan institusi pendidikan tinggi dalam menyumbang kepada kemajuan, kemakmuran dan kesejahteraan sosial, ekonomi dan politik negara melalui pembangunan modal insan yang berkemahiran tinggi sebagai satu pasukan tenaga kerja yang dihasratkan dalam Pelan Pendidikan Malaysia 2015-2025. Sehubungan itu, Fakulti Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan (FSSK), UTM telah meletakkan pentaksiran sebagai komponen penting dalam proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Pentaksiran merujuk kepada proses pengukuran pencapaian dan prestasi pelajar oleh pensyarah bagi setiap unit pembelajaran dan / atau keseluruhan kursus di pelbagai peringkat pengajian; prasiswazah dan pascasiswazah. Proses tersebut juga melibatkan pelaporan dan keputusan penting di buat berdasarkan pengumpulan bukti dan penginterpretasian data kepada pemegang taruh. Sebahagian dari proses pentaksiran juga melibatkan aktiviti reka bentuk instrumen berdasarkan hasil pembelajaran untuk memberi maklum balas yang berkesan, seterusnya penetapan gred dan pelaporan prestasi pelajar. Oleh yang demikian, usaha FSSK menghasilkan set rubrik bagi pentaksiran formatif dan sumatif bagi memenuhi keperluan pentaksiran hasil pembelajaran berdasarkan MQF 2.0 adalah relevan dan mencapai prinsip objektiviti dalam pengukuran dengan adanya instrumen penskoran yang sah dan dipercayai. Berikut adalah pernyataan dari MQF 2.0 (2017, ms 14-18) yang selari dengan keperluan pentaksiran berkaitan hasil pembelajaran.

 

Malaysian Qualification Statement (MQS) provides detailed information of a programme including the learning outcomes, accreditation status, QA system, awarding institution and is issued by HEPs to the student on successful completion of the programme. It informs learners and users of qualifications of the learning achievement and competencies of the learners and this facilitates assessment of qualifications by interested parties.

The learning outcomes of MQF 2.0 build on the existing domains, principles and practices of MQF edition 1. Learning outcomes are ‘statements on what students should know, understand and can do upon successful completion of a period of study, which generally lead to a qualification or part of a qualification’.

The generic learning outcomes are intended to provide a framework to reduce the gap between the world of education, work and responsible global citizenship and to further harmonise/integrate the systems. This is demonstrable by the skills and knowledge of learners to successfully perform in professional, educational, and other life contexts.

Thus, the levels, clusters of specific learning outcomes and credits are external standards and guide the inputs by institutions into the curriculum, teaching, learning and assessment. Many of the learning outcomes are critical-cross field outcomes, generic and relevant in different types of programmes. It will create an impact on the teaching and learning activities and strategies in assessments.
It is expected that the approach to teaching-learning and assessment supports the personal growth and progress of broader capabilities or competencies; more knowledge, better cognitive skills, obtaining new work and personal skills. The broader expectation is that the learners are expected to be able to continue to perform and improve these competencies in their working life and further education.

A set of eight domains of generic learning outcomes and 16 specific learning outcomes was established and operationalised in MQF edition 1. These continue to remain relevant and universally comparable. In MQF 2nd edition, they have been clustered, re-profiled and retained. The listed outcomes resonate and mostly align with the aspirations of the National Education Philosophy (1961), the Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 as well as the Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher Education). The MQF 2.0 is linked to, and a continuum of, the educational outcomes from basic education to higher education as set in the national blueprints.

It also is comparable to other national qualifications framework and to other regional qualifications frameworks. These learning outcomes clarify the demands and complexities of learning by each level. It is within the context of study and/or work/practice situations, where for example, knowledge and understanding is required concurrently as these traits are dominant and important in pursuing higher education and advanced skills training.

 

Langkah ini di ambil seiring dengan usaha Agensi Kelayakan Malaysia (MQA) pada tahun 2016 yang merubah PLO dari lapan (8) kluster bagi Kerangka Kelayakan Malaysia 1.0 (MQF 1.0) kepada lima (5) kluster bagi Kerangka Kelayakan Malaysia 2.0 (MQF 2.0) Jadual 1 menunjukkan maklumat terperinci bagi perubahan tersebut.

Kluster

MQF 2.0

Kluster

MQF 1.0

1

Pengetahuan dan Kefahaman  

1

Pengetahuan

2

Kemahiran Kognitif 

2

Kemahiran Praktikal

3

Kemahiran Kerja Berfungsi  

a.      Kemahiran Praktik

b.      Kemahiran Interpersonal

c.      Kemahiran Komunikasi

d.      Kemahiran Digital

e.      Kemahiran Numerasi

f.        Kemahiran Kepimpinan, Autonomi dan Kebertanggungjawaban

3

Kemahiran Sosial dan Kebertanggungjawaban

4

Kemahiran Personal

Kemahiran Keusahawanan

4

Nilai, Sikap dan Profesionalisme

5

Etika dan Profesionalisme

5

Kemahiran Komunikasi, Kepimpinan dan Keja Berpasukan

6

Kemahiran Penyelesaian Masalah dan Saintifik

7

Kemahiran Pengurusan Maklumat dan Pembelajaran Sepanjang Hayat

8

Kemahiran Pengurusan dan Keusahawanan

 

Justeru, kurikulum di FSSH juga telah di semak bagi memberi laluan kepada hasil pembelajaran di murnikan/ diubah berdasarkan ketetapan MQF 2.0 untuk diterap dalam proses pengajaran, pembelajaran dan pentaksiran. Pembinaan alat penskoran yang standard (rubrik) menjadi fokus utama FSSH supaya dapat mengukur prestasi pelajar berdasarkan Hasil Pembelajaran Program (Program Learning Outcome) yang baharu. Penggunaan rubrik secara formatif dan konstruktif diharap dapat membantu pensyarah mengesan kemajuan pembelajaran khususnya dalam tugasan yang bercirikan Pentaksiran Alternatif; seterusnya rubrik tersebut juga dapat digunakan pada pentaksiran sumatif.

 


Copyright © 2012 Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

:: ::